Could be mistaken, but the 200 person campaign limit sounds like something more concrete than we've had before.

Avoiding 360 support question too..

(December 26th 2012, 08:16 AM)Reichmar12 Wrote: Could be mistaken, but the 200 person campaign limit sounds like something more concrete than we've had before.

Avoiding 360 support question too..

I find having 200 people in one fight very big... I mean if you tried that in skyrim you'd lag your ass off.

200 is a large number, but not unheard of in open-world faction PvP. I'm more interested in the rendering technology that they will use. WAR's method was one I wasn't particularly fond of -- slicing detail AND animation frames. Everyone looked like a GIF at medium distance. I have a good rig, so graphics don't really worry me, but I really hope that rendering is a big concern for them.

(December 26th 2012, 12:07 PM)Reichmar12 Wrote: 200 is a large number, but not unheard of in open-world faction PvP. I'm more interested in the rendering technology that they will use. WAR's method was one I wasn't particularly fond of -- slicing detail AND animation frames. Everyone looked like a GIF at medium distance. I have a good rig, so graphics don't really worry me, but I really hope that rendering is a big concern for them.

Yes, your rig is good. But they aim for a wide range of computers... "5 years or so" is their aim. Btw what is your rig ? :o

(December 26th 2012, 03:14 PM)Ceydro Wrote:

(December 26th 2012, 12:07 PM)Reichmar12 Wrote: 200 is a large number, but not unheard of in open-world faction PvP. I'm more interested in the rendering technology that they will use. WAR's method was one I wasn't particularly fond of -- slicing detail AND animation frames. Everyone looked like a GIF at medium distance. I have a good rig, so graphics don't really worry me, but I really hope that rendering is a big concern for them.

Yes, your rig is good. But they aim for a wide range of computers... "5 years or so" is their aim. Btw what is your rig ? :o

5 years puts them in 8800 GTX range... I know those cards are total workhorses and can crank if they're in SLI and the like, but I anticipate the game would look kinda dumb.

I'm running a OC'd 2600k and GTX 670s.

Having 200 in a fight? It's best to be 300,the 300 Bromlokiir(lol),but I'd love to have a Warrior and has pretty pretty powerful spells,really excited about the sprinting,too bad it only came in Skyrim.Lol when Angry Joe says,"I'll completely forget about that,a speaking dog will come up to me,then I'll chase a butterfly(lol).. I totally agreed with Joe against ME3.

(December 26th 2012, 03:29 PM)Reichmar12 Wrote:

(December 26th 2012, 03:14 PM)Ceydro Wrote:

(December 26th 2012, 12:07 PM)Reichmar12 Wrote: 200 is a large number, but not unheard of in open-world faction PvP. I'm more interested in the rendering technology that they will use. WAR's method was one I wasn't particularly fond of -- slicing detail AND animation frames. Everyone looked like a GIF at medium distance. I have a good rig, so graphics don't really worry me, but I really hope that rendering is a big concern for them.

Yes, your rig is good. But they aim for a wide range of computers... "5 years or so" is their aim. Btw what is your rig ? :o

5 years puts them in 8800 GTX range... I know those cards are total workhorses and can crank if they're in SLI and the like, but I anticipate the game would look kinda dumb.

I'm running a OC'd 2600k and GTX 670s.

Wow, you're packed. No need for an upgrade :P.
I have a 6450... so fml.
Do you say AMD 7970 or GTX 670 for price/performance

Cheers for both ESO and Angry Joe! I love thatguywiththeglasses.com !!

A new video that tells us nothing new lmfao